Cerebellar metabolic symmetry in essential tremor studied with 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: implications for disease pathology.

Publication Type Academic Article
Authors Louis E, Shungu D, Mao X, Chan S, Jurewicz E
Journal Mov Disord
Volume 19
Issue 6
Pagination 672-7
Date Published 06/01/2004
ISSN 0885-3185
Keywords Cerebellum, Essential Tremor, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Tomography, Emission-Computed
Abstract The pathological basis for essential tremor (ET) is not known; however, metabolic changes in the cerebellum can be observed in positron emission tomography (PET) and (1)H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) studies. Tremor is relatively symmetric in ET, suggesting that underlying metabolic changes could be also symmetric. The degree of metabolic asymmetry in the cerebellum, however, has not yet been studied in ET, and knowledge about distribution and laterality of metabolic changes might shed some light on basic disease mechanisms. We measured brain metabolism (N-acetylaspartate[NAA]/creatine [tCR]) to obtain an asymmetry index for cerebellar cortical metabolism ET patients compared with that in controls. This index, a percentage, was calculated as [absolute value (value right - value left)]/(value right + value left) x 100. Multislice (1)H MRSI data were acquired for 20 patients and 11 controls. In ET patients, mean right and left cerebellar cortical NAA/tCR values were 1.61 +/- 0.42 and 1.55 +/- 0.38, respectively, compared with 1.81 +/- 0.62 and 1.87 +/- 0.49 in controls. The difference between right and left cerebellar cortical NAA/tCR was also calculated for each subject. In ET patients, the mean right-left difference was 0.14 +/- 0.11, compared with 0.32 +/- 0.27 in controls (P = 0.016). The mean cerebellar cortical asymmetry index was low in ET (8.8 +/- 6.1%), one-half of that in controls (17.0 +/- 13.7%, P = 0.027). These data suggest that pathological lesions in ET patients, which remain elusive, might be distributed similarly in each cerebellar cortex. Postmortem studies are needed to confirm these preliminary imaging results.
DOI 10.1002/mds.20019
PubMed ID 15197706
Back to Top