Publication Type Academic Article
Authors Kim N, O'Sullivan J, Olafson E, Caliendo E, Nowak S, Voss H, Lowder R, Watson W, Ivanidze J, Fins J, Schiff N, Hill N, Shah S
Journal Neurol Clin Pract
Volume 12
Issue 3
Pagination 248-257
Date Published 06/01/2022
ISSN 2163-0402
Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Following severe brain injury, up to 16% of adults showing no clinical signs of cognitive function nonetheless have preserved cognitive capacities detectable via neuroimaging and neurophysiology; this has been designated cognitive-motor dissociation (CMD). Pediatric medicine lacks both practice guidelines for identifying covert cognition and epidemiologic data regarding CMD prevalence. METHODS: We applied a diverse battery of neuroimaging and neurophysiologic tests to evaluate 2 adolescents (aged 15 and 18 years) who had shown no clinical evidence of preserved cognitive function following brain injury at age 9 and 13 years, respectively. Clinical evaluations were consistent with minimally conscious state (minus) and vegetative state, respectively. RESULTS: Both participants' EEG, and 1 participant's fMRI, provided evidence that they could understand commands and make consistent voluntary decisions to follow them. Both participants' EEG demonstrated larger-than-expected responses to auditory stimuli and intact semantic processing of words in context. DISCUSSION: These converging lines of evidence lead us to conclude that both participants had preserved cognitive function dissociated from their motor output. Throughout the 5+ years since injury, communication attempts and therapy had remained uninformed by such objective evidence of their cognitive abilities. Proper diagnosis of CMD is an ethical imperative. Children with covert cognition reflect a vulnerable and isolated population; the methods outlined here provide a first step in identifying such persons to advance efforts to alleviate their condition.
DOI 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001169
PubMed ID 35733619
PubMed Central ID PMC9208423
Back to Top