Operationalizing protocol differences for EADC-ADNI manual hippocampal segmentation.

Publication Type	Academic Article
Authors	Boccardi M, Bocchetta M, Ganzola R, Robitaille N, Redolfi A, Duchesne S, Jack C, Frisoni G
Journal	Alzheimers Dement
Volume	11
Issue	2
Pagination	184-94
Date Published	05/21/2013
ISSN	1552-5279
Keywords	Hippocampus, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging
Abstract	BACKGROUND: Hippocampal volumetry on magnetic resonance imaging is recognized as an Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker, and manual segmentation is the gold standard for measurement. However, a standard procedure is lacking. We operationalize and quantitate landmark differences to help a Delphi panel converge on a set of landmarks. METHODS: One hundred percent of anatomic landmark variability across 12 different protocols for manual segmentation was reduced into four segmentation units (the minimum hippocampus, the alveus/fimbria, the tail, and the subiculum), which were segmented on magnetic resonance images by expert raters to estimate reliability and AD-related atrophy. RESULTS: Intra- and interrater reliability were more than 0.96 and 0.92, respectively, except for the alveus/fimbria, which were 0.86 and 0.77, respectively. Of all AD-related atrophy, the minimum hippocampus contributed to 67%; tail, 24%; alveus/fimbria, 4%; and the subiculum, 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic landmark variability in available protocols can be reduced to four discrete and measurable segmentation units. Their quantitative assessment will help a Delphi panel to define a set of landmarks for a harmonized protocol.
DOI	10.1016/j.jalz.2013.03.001
PubMed ID	23706515