The relation between computerized and paper-and-pencil mental rotation tasks: a validation study.
| Publication Type | Academic Article |
| Authors | Voyer D, Butler T, Cordero J, Brake B, Silbersweig D, Stern E, Imperato-McGinley J |
| Journal | J Clin Exp Neuropsychol |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pagination | 928-39 |
| Date Published | 08/01/2006 |
| ISSN | 1380-3395 |
| Keywords | Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Space Perception, Task Performance and Analysis |
| Abstract | The present study aimed at validating a computerized mental rotation task developed for use in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies. Eighty-three females and 74 males completed the computerized task, two pencil-and-paper tests of mental rotation, and reported their high school grades in mathematics, English, and history. The computerized task involved the presentation of pairs of three-dimensional stimuli that differed in orientation by 0, 40, 80, 120, or 160 degrees. Results showed significant gender differences in favor of males in the three main tasks, although gender interacted with angle of rotation in the computerized task. Evidence for concurrent validity was obtained in the form of significant correlations between performance on tasks relevant to mental rotation (paper and pencil tests and mathematics grades), whereas discriminant validity was demonstrated by a lack of correlation with tasks deemed irrelevant to mental rotation (English and history grades). These findings support the use of our computerized mental rotation task as a valid measure of mental rotation abilities in fMRI studies. |
| DOI | 10.1080/13803390591004310 |
| PubMed ID | 16822733 |