Publication Type Academic Article
Authors Schär M, Ma R, Demange M, Morgan M, Chen T, Ballon D, Dyke J, Deng X, Rodeo S
Journal J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
Volume 30
Issue 1
Pagination 23094990221076654
Date Published 01/01/2022
ISSN 2309-4990
Keywords Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Abstract BACKGROUND: The availability of non-invasive means to evaluate and monitor tendon-bone healing processes in-vivo is limited. Micro Positron-Emission-Tomography (µPET) using 18F-Fluoride is a minimally invasive imaging modality, with which osteoblast activity and bone turnover can be assessed. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of serial in-vivo µPET/CT scans to evaluate bone turnover along the graft-tunnel interface in a rat ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) reconstruction model. METHODS: Unilateral autograft ACL reconstruction was performed in six rats. µPET/CT-scans using 18F-Fluoride were performed 7, 14, 21, and 28 days postoperatively. Standard uptake values (SUV) were calculated for three tunnel regions (intraarticular aperture (IAA), mid-tunnel, and extraarticular aperture (EAA)) of the proximal tibia. Animals were sacrificed at 28 days and evaluated with µCT and histological analysis. RESULTS: SUVs in both bone tunnels showed an increased 18F-Fluoride uptake at 7 days when compared to 14, 21, and 28 days. SUVs showed a gradient on the tibial side, with most bone turnover in the IAA and least in the EAA. At 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, there were significantly higher SUV values in the IAA compared to the EAA (p = .01, < .01, < .01, < .01). SUVs positively correlated with new bone volumetric density obtained with μCT (r = 0.449, p = .013). Volumetric density of newly formed bone detected on μCT correlated with osteoblast numbers observed along the tunnels in histological sections (r = 0.452, p < .016). CONCLUSIONS: Serial in-vivo µPET/CT-scanning has the potential to provide insight into bone turnover and therefore osteoblastic activity during the healing process. As a result, it allows us to directly measure the effect of interventional strategies in tendon-bone healing.
DOI 10.1177/23094990221076654
PubMed ID 35245156
Back to Top